We reviewed an editorial sample of register entries with at least 100 stored Google reviews, then required a primary practice website naming medical aesthetic services and an identifiable office. The final count reflects the evidence we could verify, rather than a fixed city quota. This is not every qualifying practice, a city census or a claim about market coverage.
Every star rating and review count in the table matches an original Google collection record from July 20, 2026 (UTC). These are historical snapshots, not current ratings. We checked service websites on October 13, 2026. Checking a menu does not refresh a review count; newer numbers displayed on a clinic website or review widget are not substituted for a direct Google collection. Follow the Google source links below for current reviews.
Within this sample, order uses the register's weighted review score: (rating multiplied by review count, plus 25 multiplied by the register's 4.9 average) divided by (review count plus 25). Scores are rounded to nine decimal places, with ties ordered by review count and name. This organizes review evidence and does not measure clinical skill, treatment safety or suitability. Displayed stars are the original Google average.
We did not visit these practices, verify individual licenses or audit outcomes. A facial-only or massage menu is not enough evidence for inclusion in this medical aesthetic comparison. Brand-wide menus require branch confirmation. The illustrative photograph is not from a compared practice.